Field Automation

Preserve trustworthy field data across distance and disconnection

Acquire, buffer and govern remote-site telemetry, device health, events and commands across unreliable networks.

Remote telemetry store-and-forward flow preserving field data during communication loss
Conceptual solution architecture; final scope is confirmed through engineering and project acceptance.

Operational problem

Remote sites must continue acquiring, alarming and executing approved local logic through protocol diversity, brownfield equipment and intermittent central connectivity.

Scadify separates canonical tags, protocol drivers, local HMI, historian, alarms and automation runtime from physical hardware. EnergyPortal, enPowerManager and enCoreEnergy consume governed field evidence and provide higher-level context.

Core capabilities

Quality-labelled telemetry

Configured according to the project’s data, control, approval and operating boundaries.

Store-and-forward and reconnect evidence

Configured according to the project’s data, control, approval and operating boundaries.

Agent heartbeat and device health

Configured according to the project’s data, control, approval and operating boundaries.

Remote configuration with audit

Configured according to the project’s data, control, approval and operating boundaries.

Governed commands and local alarms

Configured according to the project’s data, control, approval and operating boundaries.

Operational workflow

From operational context to measured action.

  1. 01Inventory remote devices and links
  2. 02Acquire and timestamp field data
  3. 03Qualify freshness and connectivity
  4. 04Buffer locally through interruption
  5. 05Synchronise and investigate exceptions

Data sources and integrations

Connect the evidence that explains the decision.

  • Meters, sensors, analyzers and actuators
  • PLCs, RTUs, BMS and existing SCADA
  • Modbus, MQTT and project-qualified telecontrol interfaces
  • Local alarms, commands, deployments and audit logs
  • Central configuration and operational policies

Governance and resilience

Scadify is intended for non-safety and project-qualified automation unless a separately validated safety architecture exists. Protocol maturity, hardware and certification status follow the release matrix.

Protocol roles, OEM compatibility, data retention, control limits and failure behaviour must be confirmed from the engineering-approved release and project documents.

Outcomes and KPI framework

Measure the operating result, not only the software activity.

Local-first operation and evidence

Use an agreed baseline, operational definition and evidence source before assigning a target.

Reusable device/tag model across field platforms

Use an agreed baseline, operational definition and evidence source before assigning a target.

Controlled protocol and command boundaries

Use an agreed baseline, operational definition and evidence source before assigning a target.

Staged integration and rollback visibility

Use an agreed baseline, operational definition and evidence source before assigning a target.

Solution architecture

Make responsibility visible from field to enterprise.

Scadify separates canonical tags, protocol drivers, local HMI, historian, alarms and automation runtime from physical hardware. EnergyPortal, enPowerManager and enCoreEnergy consume governed field evidence and provide higher-level context. The architecture separates observation, recommendation, human-approved action and local execution so that each team can see what it owns.

Remote telemetry store-and-forward flow preserving field data during communication loss
Remote telemetry store-and-forward flow preserving field data during communication loss. Important control and compliance decisions remain in the project documentation.

Engineering and implementation

Move from architecture to accepted operation.

Engineering scope can include I/O and protocol assessment, panel and network design, control logic, HMI, commissioning, migration, FAT/SAT, training and lifecycle support.

Customer applications

Discuss integration, commissioning and operational support for your equipment and sites.

Standards compliance for this capability

IEC 62682 and ISA-18.2 alarm management

Enlogy provides full compliance with the standards below across development, integration and system operation and management.

IEC 62682 and ISA-18.2 alarm management

IEC 62682 · ISA-18.2

Why you need it

Alarm floods hide important events and delay operator response.

What Enlogy provides

Enlogy manages alarm priorities, operating context, acknowledgement and response records with anomaly messages and recurring reviews of nuisance alarms.

Explore this capability: IEC 62682 and ISA-18.2 alarm management

FAQ

Questions to resolve before implementation.

What happens to data during an outage?

A qualified local agent can buffer selected data and synchronise after reconnection; retention depends on release and sizing.

Can commands use the same channel?

Command paths and permissions are project-specific and must be separated from read-only telemetry where required.

Can existing RTUs be retained?

Brownfield RTUs can be assessed for integration when their interfaces, data model and control responsibility are documented.

Next step

Define the right field automation architecture.

Discuss your project →

We use necessary storage to remember your choice. With your permission, Google Analytics measures visits and interactions; advertising options allow Google advertising measurement and optional personalised advertising. You can reject optional cookies and keep using the site.

Your choice is stored in this browser for up to 180 days. Change it at any time using Cookie preferences. Contact info@enlogy.com with privacy questions.

Read the cookie policyRead the privacy policy