Power Consumption
Make the energy management system part of daily operations
Support energy reviews, significant energy uses, baselines, EnPIs, action plans, monitoring and evidence with enCoreEnergy.
Operational problem
Utility totals rarely explain the operational reason for consumption. Weather, production, shifts, occupancy, comfort, safety and equipment constraints must be connected before a recommendation can become a safe action.
enCoreEnergy combines measurements with operational context, analytics, AI-supported recommendations, workflows and verification. Scadify or existing BMS/PLC systems provide qualified local acquisition and execution; EnergyPortal can consolidate enterprise portfolios.
Core capabilities
Energy review and significant-use context
Configured according to the project’s data, control, approval and operating boundaries.
Baselines and energy-performance indicators
Configured according to the project’s data, control, approval and operating boundaries.
Objectives, action plans and accountability
Configured according to the project’s data, control, approval and operating boundaries.
Monitoring, records and management review inputs
Configured according to the project’s data, control, approval and operating boundaries.
Evidence, versioning and workflow history
Configured according to the project’s data, control, approval and operating boundaries.
Products and delivery responsibilities
Assemble the operating stack around the action.
Consumption, multi-utility optimisation, workflows and verification.
View responsibility →EnergyPortalCentral visibility, analytics, reporting, workflows and governance.
View responsibility →ScadifyField acquisition, local automation, protocols and resilient execution.
View responsibility →Operational workflow
From operational context to measured action.
- 01Define scope and energy review
- 02Identify significant energy uses
- 03Set baseline, EnPI and objectives
- 04Assign and monitor action plans
- 05Review evidence and improve
Data sources and integrations
Connect the evidence that explains the decision.
- Utility meters and submeters
- HVAC, lighting, pumps and equipment state
- Production, shifts, schedules and occupancy
- Weather, temperature and humidity
- Tariffs, invoices and maintenance context
Governance and resilience
Direct control is constrained by installed systems, safety interlocks, operating policy and customer approval. Recommendations, workflows and closed-loop control are separate modes.
Protocol roles, OEM compatibility, data retention, control limits and failure behaviour must be confirmed from the engineering-approved release and project documents.
Outcomes and KPI framework
Measure the operating result, not only the software activity.
Normalised energy-performance indicators
Use an agreed baseline, operational definition and evidence source before assigning a target.
Prioritised demand, schedule and equipment opportunities
Use an agreed baseline, operational definition and evidence source before assigning a target.
Human-approved actions with clear ownership
Use an agreed baseline, operational definition and evidence source before assigning a target.
Baseline and reporting-period evidence
Use an agreed baseline, operational definition and evidence source before assigning a target.
Solution architecture
Make responsibility visible from field to enterprise.
enCoreEnergy combines measurements with operational context, analytics, AI-supported recommendations, workflows and verification. Scadify or existing BMS/PLC systems provide qualified local acquisition and execution; EnergyPortal can consolidate enterprise portfolios. The architecture separates observation, recommendation, human-approved action and local execution so that each team can see what it owns.
Engineering and implementation
Move from architecture to accepted operation.
Engineering scope can include meter inventory, baseline design, significant-use analysis, interlock review, pilot acceptance criteria, field integration, commissioning, operator training and M&V planning.
Customer applications
Discuss integration, commissioning and operational support for your equipment and sites.
Plan your deployment
Turn meter readings into an energy performance review
Example operating scenario
An energy manager reviews a significant energy use after a process change. Compare the indicator with its baseline and relevant variables, then record the action and its measured outcome.
Data to prepare
Significant energy uses, meter boundaries, EnPI definitions, baseline period, relevant variables and responsibility assignments.
What Enlogy provides
EnPI and baseline tracking, review records and improvement follow-up support the facility’s energy management workflow.
Questions to ask before buying
- Can indicator definitions and baseline changes be traced?
- How are operational variables included in performance comparisons?
- Can the team retrieve the inputs and actions behind a report?
Illustrative workflow; project scope and acceptance criteria are agreed for your facility.
Standards compliance for this capability
ISO 50001 energy performance management
Enlogy provides full compliance with the standards below across development, integration and system operation and management.
ISO 50001 energy performance management
ISO 50001 · ISO 50006 · ISO 50015
Why you need it
Energy teams need a repeatable way to establish baselines, track indicators and measure improvement.
What Enlogy provides
Enlogy manages significant energy uses, EnPIs, baselines, action plans and measurement and verification records, connecting continuous analysis to energy management.
Related solutions and products
Continue with the next operational question.
FAQ
Questions to resolve before implementation.
Does enCoreEnergy certify an organisation?
No. It can support ISO 50001-oriented processes; certification is issued by an accredited certification body after an independent audit.
Can existing baselines be imported?
Existing baselines and EnPIs can be mapped where their definitions, periods and source data are available.
Is ISO 50001 only for factories?
No. The management-system approach can be applied to relevant organisations and facilities with an appropriate scope.
Next step